UNVEILING THE NEXUS BETWEEN GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES AND THE RIPPLE EFFECT ON ECONOMIC LANDSCAPES
Muhammad Harunurashid Thelatha
DOI:
Keywords:
Government guarantees, Sustainable risk, Macro-econometric Model
Abstract
This article delves into a comprehensive examination of the Government Guarantees (GG) in shaping economic stability and promoting growth through sustained private expenditure in various sectors. This study shows the GG's importance in elucidating confidence among consumers and businesses, particularly in providing financial support for social commitments or risky projects. It also serves as a counter-cyclical measure preventing total failure during periods of recession and facilitating recovery efforts. Empirical analysis from the Macro-econometric model (MM) approach shows that the behavioural equations are significant and consistent with anticipated theoretical patterns proving the credibility of the model. Furthermore, diagnostic tests confirm the absence of problems such as heteroscedasticity and serial correlation demonstrating the model's robustness. Sensitivity analysis shows that when GG rises by 1 percentage point (ppt), nominal Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will increase by 0.302 ppt, mainly through the private expenditure channel. Based on the model, nominal growth is estimated at 7.3% for 2024 and projected at 7.4% for 2025, respectively, mainly driven by domestic demand activities as well as GG growth trajectories. Early detection of signs of financial distress is very important to prevent GG default. Equally important is recognising GG's significant contribution to national economies by adopting binding approaches to prudent risk management and reporting, such as the Public Finance and Fiscal Responsibility Act 2023 [Act 850]; and equally essential are robust monitoring mechanisms as well as risk mitigation measures. Compliance with the recommended policies will enhance the effectiveness of GG, facilitate equitable resource distribution as well as promote economic growth and stability.
References
Act 850. Public Finance and Fiscal Responsibility Act 2023.
Anghel, D. G., Boitan, I. A., & Marchewka-Bartkowiak, K. (2022). Growing fiscal risk in European Union resulting from government contingent liabilities in the pandemic crisis-assessment and policy recommendations. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 2292-2312.
Chaklader, B., & Mundi, H. S. (2024). Do contingent liabilities affect dividend decisions?. Managerial Finance, 50(4), 734-747.
Fiscal Outlook and Federal Government Revenue Estimates 2025. (2024). Ministry of Finance Malaysia.
Kasimati, E., & Dawson, P. (2009). Assessing the impact of the 2004 Olympic Games on the Greek economy: A small macroeconometric model. Economic modelling, 26(1), 139-146.
Liu, C., Liu, H., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., & Guo, M. (2022). Dispersed analysts' forecasts of firms' operational uncertainties and stock returns. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 23(3), 316-326.
Nath, S., & Raganata, G. (2020). An Assessment of Economic and Financial Impacts of Jakarta-Bandung High-Speed Railway Project. Journal of Business and Political Economy: Biannual Review of The Indonesian Economy, 2(1), 45-55.
Rizwan, M. S., Ahmad, G., & Ashraf, D. (2020). Systemic risk: The impact of COVID-19. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101682.

